Seattle U.
Men
-
Women
2014
-
2015 -
2016
Switch to All-time Team Page
Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
720 |
Lila Rice |
JR |
21:14 |
943 |
Olivia Stein |
FR |
21:30 |
944 |
Elena Smith |
SR |
21:31 |
1,198 |
Moira O'Connor Lenth |
JR |
21:49 |
1,570 |
Johanna Erickson |
SO |
22:14 |
1,581 |
Lindsay Frederick |
SR |
22:15 |
2,176 |
Taylor de Laveaga |
SR |
22:56 |
|
National Rank |
#180 of 339 |
West Region Rank |
#27 of 39 |
Chance of Advancing to Nationals |
0.0% |
Most Likely Finish |
25th at Regional |
National Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
Regional Champion |
0.0% |
Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 10 in Regional |
0.0% |
Top 20 in Regional |
13.3% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Lila Rice |
Olivia Stein |
Elena Smith |
Moira O'Connor Lenth |
Johanna Erickson |
Lindsay Frederick |
Taylor de Laveaga |
Washington Invitational |
10/02 |
1201 |
21:03 |
21:43 |
21:33 |
21:39 |
22:21 |
22:38 |
22:02 |
Emerald City Open |
10/17 |
1203 |
20:59 |
21:38 |
21:41 |
21:53 |
|
23:00 |
22:18 |
Western Athletic Conference Championships |
10/31 |
1228 |
21:43 |
21:27 |
21:28 |
22:04 |
22:21 |
22:49 |
23:27 |
West Region Championships |
11/13 |
1199 |
21:17 |
21:19 |
21:27 |
21:47 |
22:00 |
21:48 |
23:32 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Region Championship |
100% |
24.1 |
687 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
0.1 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
2.4 |
4.0 |
5.7 |
7.5 |
8.9 |
10.1 |
12.0 |
13.2 |
13.0 |
9.8 |
6.7 |
3.4 |
1.4 |
0.5 |
NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results
Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
Lila Rice |
100.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olivia Stein |
124.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Elena Smith |
125.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moira O'Connor Lenth |
153.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Johanna Erickson |
190.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lindsay Frederick |
191.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taylor de Laveaga |
236.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
7 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7 |
8 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8 |
9 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9 |
10 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 |
11 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11 |
12 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12 |
13 |
0.0% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
13 |
14 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14 |
15 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
15 |
16 |
0.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.4 |
|
|
16 |
17 |
0.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.7 |
|
|
17 |
18 |
2.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.4 |
|
|
18 |
19 |
4.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
19 |
20 |
5.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
|
20 |
21 |
7.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7.5 |
|
|
21 |
22 |
8.9% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8.9 |
|
|
22 |
23 |
10.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
23 |
24 |
12.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
12.0 |
|
|
24 |
25 |
13.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.2 |
|
|
25 |
26 |
13.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13.0 |
|
|
26 |
27 |
9.8% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
27 |
28 |
6.7% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
|
28 |
29 |
3.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3.4 |
|
|
29 |
30 |
1.4% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
30 |
31 |
0.5% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.5 |
|
|
31 |
32 |
0.2% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
|
|
32 |
33 |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.0 |
|
|
33 |
34 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
34 |
35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35 |
36 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
36 |
37 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37 |
38 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
38 |
39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39 |
|
Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
|
Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
Maximum |
|
|
0.0 |